FINANCIAL LIBERALIZATION AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY: EVIDENCE FROM TUNISIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/esr.v22i1.3307Keywords:
Growth, Energy, Financial development, TradeAbstract
The purpose of this study is to examine whether the liberalization of the financial sector has deteriorated the quality of the environment in Tunisia. To this end, we used data which covers the period from 1971 to 2011 and we applied an econometric model based on cointegration analysis and error correction techniques. The empirical results reveal strong evidence of the existence of a bidirectional causal relationship between per capita carbon emissions and per capita real income. On the one hand, this interdependency indicates that Tunisia needs more carbon dioxide emissions to realize prosperity and buoyant economic growth. On the other hand, more carbon dioxide emissions also stimulate higher economic growth. Therefore, policy makers should take the right decision on how to preserve environment quality without hampering economic growth.
References
Al-Iriani, M., 2006. Energy–GDP relationship revisited: An example from GCC countries using panel causality. Energy Policy, 34(17), 3342–3350
Antweiler, W., Copeland, B., Taylor, M., 2001. Is Free Trade Good for the Environment? American Economic Review, 91(4), 877-908.
Belloumi, M., 2009. Energy consumption and GDP in Tunisia: Cointegration and causality analysis. Energy Policy 37 (7), 2745–2753.
Boulila, G., Trabelsi, M., 2004. Financial Development and Long-run Growth: Evidence from Tunisia: 1962-1997. Savings and Development, 289-314.
Boutabba, M.A., 2013. The impact of financial development, income, energy and trade on carbon emissions: Evidence from the Indian economy. Document de recherché, EPEE, University of Evry-Val d'Essonne.
Brack, D., 1998. Trade and Environment: Conflict or Compatibility? Chatam House, London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
Çoban, S., Topcu, M., 2013. The nexus between financial development and energy consumption in the EU: A dynamic panel data analysis. Energy Economics 39, 81-88.
Dean, J., 1999. Does Trade Liberalization Harm the Environment? A New Test. Working Paper. School of Advanced International Studies, The Johns Hopkins University
Dickey, D.A., Fuller, W.A., 1981. Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrika, 49 (4), 1057–1072.
Frankel, J., 2009. Environmental effect of international trade. Scholarly article 4481652, Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
Ghani, G., 2012. Does trade liberalization effect energy consumption? Energy Policy 43, 285–290.
Grossman, G., Krueger, A., 1993. Environmental Impacts of NAFTA in P. Garber (ed.), The US-Mexico Free Trade Agreement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Halicioglu, F., 2009. An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy 37(3), 1156-1164.
Hakimi A and Hamdi H. 2016. Trade Liberalization, FDI inflows, Environmental Quality and Economic growth: A comparative analysis between Tunisia and Morocco. Renewable and Sustainable and Energy Review. Forthcoming.
Hamdi H , Hakimi A and Djlassi M. 2013, Did Financial Liberalization Lead To Bank Fragility? Evidence form Tunisia. The International Journal of Business and Finance Research. V7 (5), 2013.
Hamdi H 2013. Testing Export-led-Growth in Tunisia and Morocco: New Evidence using the Toda and Yamamoto procedure. Economics Bulletin, vol33 N2, pp 1193-1203.
Johansen, S., 1988. Statistical analysis of cointegrating vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12, 231–254.
Johansen and Juselius 1990. Maximum Likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration- with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52 (2), 169–210.
Kakar, Z-K., Khilji, B., Khan, M-J., 2011. Financial Development and Energy Consumption: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 2 (6), 469-471.
Kraft, J., Kraft, A. 1978. On the relationship between energy and GNP. Journal of Energy and Development, 401-403.
Lee, C.C., 2006. The causality relationship between energy consumption and GDP in G-11 countries revisited. Energy Policy 34(9), 1086–1093.
Magazzino, C., 2011. Energy consumption and aggregate income in Italy: cointegration and causality analysis. MPRA Paper No. 28494
Managi, S., Hibiki, A., Tsurumi, T., 2009 Does Trade Liberalization Reduce Pollution Emissions? RIETI Discussion Paper Series 08-E-013.
Naranpanawa, A., 2011. Does Trade Openness Promote Carbon Emissions? Empirical Evidence from Sri Lanka. The Empirical Economics Letters, 10 (10), 973-986.
Ozturk, I., Acaravci, A., 2013. The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey. Energy Economics, 36, 262–267.
Pao, H-T., Fu, H-C., 2013. The causal relationship between energy resources and economic growth in Brazil. Energy Policy, 61, 793–801.
Phillips, P.C.B., Perron, P., 1988. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75 (2), 336–346.
Soytas, U., Sari, R., 2006. Can China contribute more to the fight against global warming?. Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, 28(8), 837-846.
Toda, H. Y., Yamamoto, T., 1995. Statistical inference in vector auto regressions with possibly integrated processes, Journal of Econometrics, 66, 225-50.
Ulph, A., 1994. Environmental Policy and International Trade-A Survey of Recent Economic Analysis. University of Southampton Discussion Paper in Economics and Econometrics, 9423.
Ubben, J. R., 1999. Trade Liberalization and Environmental Quality: Opposing Viewpoints, Additional Issues, and the Necessity of Intervention, Major Themes in Economics, University of Northern IOWA.
Van Beers, C., Van den Bergh, J.C.J.M., 1996. An overview of Methodological Approaches in the Analysis of Trade and Environment. Journal of World Trade 30(1), 143-167.
World Bank, 2012. World Development Indicators. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Yuan, J., Zhao, C., Yu, S., Hu, Z., 2007. Electricity consumption and economic growth in China: Cointegration and co-feature analysis. Energy Economics, 29(6), 1179-1191.
Yuan, J., Kang, J., Yu, C., Hu, Z., 2011. Energy conservation and emissions reduction in China—Progress and prospective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15 (9), 4334-4347.
Yuxiang, K., Chen, Z., 2010. Financial development and environmental performance: evidence from China. Environment and Development Economics 16, 1-19.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Rights for Authors
As further described in our submission agreement (the Submission Agreement), in consideration for publication of the article, the authors assign to Energy Studies Review all copyright in the article, subject to the expansive personal--use exceptions described below.
Attribution and Usage Policies
Reproduction, posting, transmission or other distribution or use of the article or any material therein, in any medium as permitted by a personal-use exemption or by written agreement of Energy Studies Review, requires credit to Energy Studies Review as copyright holder (e.g., Energy Studies Review © 2014).
Personal-use Exceptions
The following uses are always permitted to the author(s) and do not require further permission from DigitalCommons@McMaster provided the author does not alter the format or content of the articles, including the copyright notification:
- Storage and back-up of the article on the author's computer(s) and digital media (e.g., diskettes, back-up servers, Zip disks, etc.), provided that the article stored on these computers and media is not readily accessible by persons other than the author(s);
- Posting of the article on the author(s) personal website, provided that the website is non-commercial;
- Posting of the article on the internet as part of a non-commercial open access institutional repository or other non-commercial open access publication site affiliated with the author(s)'s place of employment (e.g., a Phrenology professor at the University of Southern North Dakota can have her article appear in the University of Southern North Dakota's Department of Phrenology online publication series); and
- Posting of the article on a non-commercial course website for a course being taught by the author at the university or college employing the author.
People seeking an exception, or who have questions about use, should contact the editors.
